Islamic scholars and inquirers have put forward the argument that on what basis did Khezr performed his three actions? Was it according to the religious Law, or the universal Law of creation? Are we really permitted to put a fault in something that belongs to some one else, just to prevent some one else to seize it? Or is it lawful to slay a boy who might commit a crime in future? Or is it necessary for us to toil and work free of any charge, to protect other people's wealth and treasure?

      The jurisprudents, and those who are well versed in the religious Law, say that; when Khezr scuttled the ship, he did something less important to save something which was very important.... much more than the charge; and this sort of actions are lawful and praiseworthy in the sight and doctrine of God's religion. On the other hand; the consent and pleasure of the poor owners of the ship could have been foreseen. Therefore what Khezr did with the ship, was not wrong.

      As for the boy; the expounders of Qurän believe that he had already reached a stage of guilt and evil, so as to have been condemned to death. In other word he had been apostate, and mischief maker; so much so, that his present could be an illustration of his future.

      And as for the repair of the wall; it should not bring forward any argument, because sacrifices for the good of other people in need; is a praiseworthy act by all the religions and creeds.

      On the other hand, Allah has created the universe according to His General Plan, which is based upon certain rules and laws. Violating these laws and regulations, must have, and it really has, its own due reaction; depending on how far someone has gone astray, and howmuch has he violated the rules of creation. Therefore, the world is controlled under the dominion, and supreme authority of two orders; universal or religious. Allah may make use of both kinds of regulations, to control the events that may happen in the creation and throughout the universe.